It's also one of the company's flagship products, so bugs are quickly squashed.
#Mozilla thunderbird vs outlook full#
Similarly, Gmail has the full weight of Google's considerable cloud power behind it, so outages are a blessed rarity.
#Mozilla thunderbird vs outlook software#
If you're using Office 365, you can also rest assured that you'll get the latest software updates and bug fixes automatically to ensure maximum uptime. As an enterprise-grade email solution, Microsoft has a lot invested in making sure that Outlook performs as smoothly and reliably as possible. Outlook used to have something of a reputation as being buggy and temperamental, but that's largely a thing of the past now. It actually has more in-depth, granular search controls to let you sift through huge numbers of messages quickly and efficiently, as well as lots of filtering and categorisation options to ensure your inbox is neat and ordered. Oddly enough, the best email client for actually searching and sorting through messages is actually Outlook. However, there's not a vast amount of scope for setting up your own granular rules or policies outside of this. Gmail can be divided up into five separate 'tabs', which Gmail will automatically soft your mail into, and you can reorder how your emails appear based on a couple of pre-set options.
It's similarly restrictive when it comes to inbox filters and sorting. Using the company's pedigree in search technology, Gmail is excellent at showing you what you're looking for, but most of the actual searching goes on beneath the hood. Unsurprisingly, Gmail's search tools are also very in-depth, with plenty of different tips and tricks to use for those that know their way around a search bar. There's also the standard suite of date, subject and sender sorting. You can narrow down the emails that show up in your inbox by unread and starred status, whether or not they have attachments and tags, and whether or not the sender is in your contacts. Thankfully, the inbox filtration options are a lot more useful. There are options to filter search results by sender, whether they were sent by or to you, and whether they had an attachment, but it pales in comparison to more granular offerings. Thunderbird's searching options are rudimentary at best.
It's also rather visually unprepossessing, lacking a lot of the individuality of its rivals. All of the text in the inbox appears uncomfortably small, and while you can enlarge the actual messages themselves, there's no obvious way to increase the font size of the inbox listings. Ultimately, it's Thunderbird that comes off worst in this particular comparison. On the other hand, it is in danger of becoming slightly bloated with features, and unless you're an Outlook power user, you're unlikely to use most of them. Although it packs more bells and whistles into its interface than Gmail's streamlined offering, Microsoft manages to stop its inbox becoming too cluttered and oppressive. The list of emails is compact and efficient without being too squashed together, and there's a raft of customisation options you can use to tweak the layout if you're not quite happy. Google has perfected its minimalist design, and the Gmail inbox is simple, clear, and easy to navigate. Gmail is possibly the best example of this. If you're going to be dealing with your emails on a regular basis, you'll want to make sure that the interface isn't going to give you a headache.
The most important part of any email client is its interface. We put the three email clients head to head, to see which one is best suited to the modern workplace.
But which email client should you use?įor years, Microsoft's Outlook was king of the business mail clients, but Gmail has now become a genuine contender in corporate as well as commercial settings, and Thunderbird remains one of the best-known open source offerings for those on a tighter budget. Despite repeated reports that instant messaging tools like Slack and WhatsApp are soon to replace email, virtually all global business relies on email to some extent.
0 kommentar(er)
